The Latest in Social Media Compliance for Banks
Social media continues to be a critical marketing and engagement tool for banks and credit unions, but with increased regulatory scrutiny, compliance remains a top priority. The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) Social Media Guidance, originally issued in 2013, remains the primary framework for managing social media risk in financial institutions. However, as digital banking evolves, so do compliance expectations—with new risks emerging in AI-driven marketing, customer interactions, and cybersecurity.
This guide provides a refresher on FFIEC compliance requirements and explores recent updates and best practices for 2025.
FFIEC Social Media Compliance Basics
The FFIEC’s Social Media Guidance outlines how financial institutions should manage risk associated with social media. It applies to banks, credit unions, and non-bank financial institutions and is enforced by the FDIC, OCC, Federal Reserve, CFPB, and NCUA.
Key Risk Areas Covered by FFIEC Guidance
Compliance Risk
Ensuring adherence to consumer protection laws and regulations, such as:
Truth in Savings Act (TISA) / Regulation DD (APY disclosures)
Truth in Lending Act (TILA) / Regulation Z (loan disclosures)
Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP)
Fair Lending Laws (ECOA, FHA)
Reputation Risk
Managing negative publicity, misleading marketing, and public complaints.
Operational Risk
Addressing cybersecurity threats, account takeovers, and fraud.
Third-Party Risk
Ensuring vendors and influencers follow compliance guidelines when posting about your institution.
Legal Risk
Archiving social media content for regulatory examinations and legal disputes.
What’s New for 2025?
While the FFIEC has not officially updated its 2013 guidance, banks are facing new compliance expectations driven by evolving risks.
Increased Scrutiny of AI-Generated Marketing Content
With the rise of AI-driven chatbots and automated social media posts, regulators are concerned about:
Misleading or inaccurate financial advice from AI-generated responses
Failure to include required disclosures when AI creates promotional content
Bias and discrimination risks in AI-driven ad targeting (Fair Lending Act implications)
Best Practice: Banks should manually review and approve AI-generated social media posts before publishing. AI tools must align with compliance policies and be monitored for accuracy.
Heightened UDAAP Enforcement on Social Media Promotions
Regulators have cracked down on “deceptive” promotions in bank social media campaigns, especially when posts:
Fail to disclose key details about APYs, interest rates, or fees
Use “limited-time offer” language without clear expiration dates
Bury important disclaimers in small text or links
Best Practice:
Clearly disclose all terms upfront in social media ads
Use standardized disclosure templates for financial promotions
Archive all posts to prove compliance in case of audits
Enhanced Recordkeeping and Archiving Expectations
Examiners are paying closer attention to how banks document and archive their social media activity.
Deleting a post without proper recordkeeping can be considered a compliance failure
Regulators expect banks to retain all social media interactions, including deleted comments
Best Practice:
Use an automated social media archiving tool (like Bank Monitor)
Ensure archives include timestamps, edits, and deleted content
Stronger Emphasis on Customer Complaint Monitoring
Social media has become a primary channel for customer complaints—and regulators now view it as a required area of oversight for banks.
Regulatory Expectation: Banks must identify, track, and respond to complaints made on social media to prevent UDAAP and CRA violations.
Best Practice:
Establish a formal process for monitoring and responding to social media complaints
Train staff to identify complaints that could lead to regulatory scrutiny
Maintain records of complaint resolutions for examiners
New Focus on Influencer and Third-Party Compliance
Banks partnering with social media influencers or third-party marketers must ensure:
All posts comply with FFIEC, FTC, and UDAAP guidelines
Influencers clearly disclose paid partnerships with the bank
Any marketing includes proper financial disclosures
Best Practice:
Review influencer posts before they go live to ensure compliance
Require influencers to sign a compliance agreement outlining their responsibilities
Monitor third-party vendors and agencies for regulatory risks
How Banks Can Strengthen Social Media Compliance in 2025
To stay ahead of regulatory scrutiny, banks should:
Conduct an Annual Social Media Risk Assessment – Review compliance gaps, new risks, and policy updates
Implement Real-Time Social Media Monitoring – Use compliance automation tools to automatically capture and archive all social media content, and provide real-time alerts of potential policy violations
Train Employees and Marketing Teams Regularly – Ensure staff understands FFIEC regulations and recent enforcement trends
Develop a Social Media Compliance Playbook – Create pre-approved templates for marketing campaigns to reduce compliance risk
Archive and Audit Social Media Content – Maintain detailed records of posts, edits, and customer interactions for at least 3–5 years
Final Thoughts: Proactive Compliance is Key
While the FFIEC’s Social Media Guidance has not been formally updated since 2013, regulatory expectations continue to evolve. With increased scrutiny on AI-generated content, promotional transparency, recordkeeping, and third-party marketing, banks must take a proactive approach to compliance in 2025.
By integrating automated compliance monitoring, employee training, and strict social media oversight, financial institutions can reduce risk, avoid costly fines, and maintain trust with regulators and customers alike.
Need Help Managing Social Media Compliance?
Let’s Talk!
📞 Call us at 318-243-1076
📧 Email jill@springmediasolutions.com or monte@springmediasolutions.com
📝 Or request a free consultation to get started